新品:
¥2,860¥2,860 税込
ポイント: 29pt
(1%)
お届け日 (配送料: ¥480
):
4月13日 - 15日
発送元: 現在発送にお時間を頂戴しております。創業15年の信頼と実績。采文堂書店 販売者: 現在発送にお時間を頂戴しております。創業15年の信頼と実績。采文堂書店
新品:
¥2,860¥2,860 税込
ポイント: 29pt
(1%)
お届け日 (配送料: ¥480
):
4月13日 - 15日
発送元: 現在発送にお時間を頂戴しております。創業15年の信頼と実績。采文堂書店
販売者: 現在発送にお時間を頂戴しております。創業15年の信頼と実績。采文堂書店
中古品: ¥455
中古品:
¥455

無料のKindleアプリをダウンロードして、スマートフォン、タブレット、またはコンピューターで今すぐKindle本を読むことができます。Kindleデバイスは必要ありません。
ウェブ版Kindleなら、お使いのブラウザですぐにお読みいただけます。
携帯電話のカメラを使用する - 以下のコードをスキャンし、Kindleアプリをダウンロードしてください。
不倫のDNA: ヒトはなぜ浮気をするのか 単行本 – 2001/11/15
{"desktop_buybox_group_1":[{"displayPrice":"¥2,860","priceAmount":2860.00,"currencySymbol":"¥","integerValue":"2,860","decimalSeparator":null,"fractionalValue":null,"symbolPosition":"left","hasSpace":false,"showFractionalPartIfEmpty":true,"offerListingId":"TCIX8VTeF4H5TAgKsjCkpshDYoLgaI8Q4aqXEKBPkv1rg0BEL9Dbg%2F7gWnbYJglncvn3kqVhR%2FcQnGhen9giqt0TNSWE9QiKI8YQdsaJC8yNqvx2IoNg1jaxRezpcLHKB90v79mFTIyKk7U7jJrbbVLjHr7cN5jOBgVbmVVuaRR0vesLazxKjw%3D%3D","locale":"ja-JP","buyingOptionType":"NEW","aapiBuyingOptionIndex":0}, {"displayPrice":"¥455","priceAmount":455.00,"currencySymbol":"¥","integerValue":"455","decimalSeparator":null,"fractionalValue":null,"symbolPosition":"left","hasSpace":false,"showFractionalPartIfEmpty":true,"offerListingId":"TCIX8VTeF4H5TAgKsjCkpshDYoLgaI8Q5cZTbuh0dqQwh4kkIPz5G5rXMQNr9ruafiLcWFgSlVrP6%2BFNNgRLKuqP4OW3UNXxJ6KMUaNLmDEeXDMNdeA0oldk5Cgd%2FzpOEDLRoFCrmP7f3fRl2yaDeeH0R6wYk7cbzbbGEc9x2R30wu6%2Fx2%2BEdA%3D%3D","locale":"ja-JP","buyingOptionType":"USED","aapiBuyingOptionIndex":1}]}
購入オプションとあわせ買い
- 本の長さ370ページ
- 言語日本語
- 出版社青土社
- 発売日2001/11/15
- ISBN-104791759206
- ISBN-13978-4791759200
この商品を買った人はこんな商品も買っています
ページ 1 以下のうち 1 最初から観るページ 1 以下のうち 1
商品の説明
内容(「MARC」データベースより)
あらゆる生物は「不倫」を指向する。哺乳類界の異端児ヒトは、DNAに刻み込まれたこの指令と如何に折り合いを付けてきたのか。付けるべきなのか。気鋭の生物学者と精神科医が、人類最大の普遍的ディレンマに真正面から挑む。
登録情報
- 出版社 : 青土社 (2001/11/15)
- 発売日 : 2001/11/15
- 言語 : 日本語
- 単行本 : 370ページ
- ISBN-10 : 4791759206
- ISBN-13 : 978-4791759200
- Amazon 売れ筋ランキング: - 843,804位本 (本の売れ筋ランキングを見る)
- - 410位遺伝子・分子生物学
- カスタマーレビュー:
著者について
著者をフォローして、新作のアップデートや改善されたおすすめを入手してください。
著者の本をもっと発見したり、よく似た著者を見つけたり、著者のブログを読んだりしましょう
著者の本をもっと発見したり、よく似た著者を見つけたり、著者のブログを読んだりしましょう
-
トップレビュー
上位レビュー、対象国: 日本
レビューのフィルタリング中に問題が発生しました。後でもう一度試してください。
2013年9月21日に日本でレビュー済み
読んでいる途中で、解らなくなって読み切ってはいません。少しもったいなかったです。
2003年4月27日に日本でレビュー済み
何やら邦題がいかがわしいのでトンデモ科学本の類いかと思われる方がいるかも知れませんが、内容は至ってマジメ、堅過ぎる位のもので、大量の動物行動のデータを参照し乍ら「単婚性は一般に思われている程生物界に於いては普遍的な現象ではない」と云うことを延々述べているだけの本です。「つがい外交尾」と「つがい内交尾」、「一夫多妻」と「一妻多夫」等、混乱し易い諸概念をきっちり別けて論じているので、「社会的単婚」と「性的単婚」が実は多くの場合に於いて一致しない等の驚く様な報告を読む時にも、正確な理解が望めます。
R・ベイカーの『精子戦争』の様な、人間社会の考察に関しては余り多くの紙面を割いてはいない様ですが、進化と云う大きな舞台の上で、性がどの様な戦略を用いているか、と云うことをきちんと知ることによって、我々自身の目の前にある諸問題を、もう一度冷静に見直してみる機会が生まれるのではないか、と云うのが大体の主張の様です。また論旨は別にしても、動物達の事例が実に豊富なので、それらをざっと眺めてみるだけでも結構楽しい本です。
R・ベイカーの『精子戦争』の様な、人間社会の考察に関しては余り多くの紙面を割いてはいない様ですが、進化と云う大きな舞台の上で、性がどの様な戦略を用いているか、と云うことをきちんと知ることによって、我々自身の目の前にある諸問題を、もう一度冷静に見直してみる機会が生まれるのではないか、と云うのが大体の主張の様です。また論旨は別にしても、動物達の事例が実に豊富なので、それらをざっと眺めてみるだけでも結構楽しい本です。
他の国からのトップレビュー

Halo
5つ星のうち5.0
A Fascinating Inductive Ride
2019年2月8日にアメリカ合衆国でレビュー済みAmazonで購入
While some may not initially see the comparisons of avian social vs. sexual monogamy to human social and sexual interactions as relevant, Barash and Lipton's additional citations from both human behavioral and physiological data prove it to be aptly related. The conclusion they drew from these data seems to be about as inductively strong as could be expected in 2001: humans are not instinctively sexually monogamous. Additional research over the last 18 years has only strengthened this claim.
In reading this, individuals who have faced, or who are currently facing, a partner involved in 'extra-pair copulation' (and are experiencing all of the feelings that may accompany it which have been instilled within us from our society) may be ultimately dealing with some sensitive responses including:
1) Rejecting the data outright, no matter how strong the inferences may be, because if they accept the data they may:
2) Be racked with guilt over the fact that, while their partner did indeed break a promise (spoken or societally implied), the promise was (most likely) made in ignorance of the biological imperatives at work within their body and mind. Even more, the guilt may deepen as they realize that the relationship did not have to end over sex and that maybe "if we both had only known that we were entering into an agreement contrary to human instincts (like celibacy for most human beings), maybe we both would have responded differently and the friendship that we had would not have ended…" However, even with such regret, perhaps this information could:
3) Allow the offended partner a deeper level of understanding of themselves and others, thusly aiding them in bestowing forgiveness towards the one who committed the infraction of breaking a promise nature never intended them to make. Such forgiveness may not perfectly fix the relationship, but it may allow for a deeper healing for both parties.
All in all, this work has the ability to soothe or pain depending upon the reader's attachment to monogamy as a moral concept; if they believe that monogamy is the 'right' thing to do (or a categorical imperative), they will probably reject the empirical data found within. However, if they are even slightly open to the possibility that monogamy might not be as virtuous as we are socially influenced to believe, then perhaps it will allow for healing, or at the very least a deeper understanding of the world around them.
In reading this, individuals who have faced, or who are currently facing, a partner involved in 'extra-pair copulation' (and are experiencing all of the feelings that may accompany it which have been instilled within us from our society) may be ultimately dealing with some sensitive responses including:
1) Rejecting the data outright, no matter how strong the inferences may be, because if they accept the data they may:
2) Be racked with guilt over the fact that, while their partner did indeed break a promise (spoken or societally implied), the promise was (most likely) made in ignorance of the biological imperatives at work within their body and mind. Even more, the guilt may deepen as they realize that the relationship did not have to end over sex and that maybe "if we both had only known that we were entering into an agreement contrary to human instincts (like celibacy for most human beings), maybe we both would have responded differently and the friendship that we had would not have ended…" However, even with such regret, perhaps this information could:
3) Allow the offended partner a deeper level of understanding of themselves and others, thusly aiding them in bestowing forgiveness towards the one who committed the infraction of breaking a promise nature never intended them to make. Such forgiveness may not perfectly fix the relationship, but it may allow for a deeper healing for both parties.
All in all, this work has the ability to soothe or pain depending upon the reader's attachment to monogamy as a moral concept; if they believe that monogamy is the 'right' thing to do (or a categorical imperative), they will probably reject the empirical data found within. However, if they are even slightly open to the possibility that monogamy might not be as virtuous as we are socially influenced to believe, then perhaps it will allow for healing, or at the very least a deeper understanding of the world around them.

Trevor Goodchild
5つ星のうち5.0
Iconoclasm in fine form
2008年7月5日にアメリカ合衆国でレビュー済みAmazonで購入
Please ignore the reviews of people here who haven't read the book, or people with an agenda or people talking about "logical fallacies" without seemingly knowing what that means.
This book is an examination of the sexual practices of a wide variety of species of animals, including humans. The book concludes that there are significant evolutionary advantages to non-monogamous sexual relationships and there seem to be very clear bodily adaptations that evolved because of this. These points are just not arguable in good faith.
The book doesn't draw any conclusions about the "naturalness" of monogomy except that it is rare, because that discussion is metaphysics at best; the religious among us use "natural" as a proxy for "our interpretation of gods will" or "how we think society ought to be". We live in a dangerous age where people are willing to deny the truth as it suits them. We have a duty as rational beings to accept objective truth no matter how unpalatable.
I think the book is a very good read if you're at all interested in the topic. I did not however find the writing style very interesting, and I had trouble keeping track of the many many types of animals discussed and their various traits. I also felt the conclusion was far too apologetic towards current societal beliefs and a bit simple minded. Nevertheless, a good read if you're interested in the subject.
This book is an examination of the sexual practices of a wide variety of species of animals, including humans. The book concludes that there are significant evolutionary advantages to non-monogamous sexual relationships and there seem to be very clear bodily adaptations that evolved because of this. These points are just not arguable in good faith.
The book doesn't draw any conclusions about the "naturalness" of monogomy except that it is rare, because that discussion is metaphysics at best; the religious among us use "natural" as a proxy for "our interpretation of gods will" or "how we think society ought to be". We live in a dangerous age where people are willing to deny the truth as it suits them. We have a duty as rational beings to accept objective truth no matter how unpalatable.
I think the book is a very good read if you're at all interested in the topic. I did not however find the writing style very interesting, and I had trouble keeping track of the many many types of animals discussed and their various traits. I also felt the conclusion was far too apologetic towards current societal beliefs and a bit simple minded. Nevertheless, a good read if you're interested in the subject.

Holly Ann Swank
5つ星のうち4.0
Myth of Monogamy
2012年1月9日にアメリカ合衆国でレビュー済みAmazonで購入
Very scientific perspective of how polyamory is in our genes....would recommend this book for those struggling with the issues, but it's not a silver bullet.

J. Grattan
5つ星のうち3.0
Is it a myth? (3.25*s)
2013年6月10日にアメリカ合衆国でレビュー済みAmazonで購入
This book is an interesting look at the sexual biology and behavior found in the animal kingdom including Homo sapiens. The authors are primarily concerned with the prevalence of monogamy in species ranging from insects, fish, birds, and mammals to humans. It turns out that monogamy is quite rare indeed, even among those species where it has long been thought that monogamy was the norm.
The key question about this book is the relevance of sexual behavior among all other animals to us. The behavior of animals is all "natural" and has evolved to ensure the reproduction of the species. Of course, humans are too natural creatures, but we, with our immense brains, have an immense capacity for learning and establishing highly complex social systems with all kinds of enforcement mechanisms, both subtle and direct. Certainly, in Western societies, marriage and monogamy are the only socially permitted relationships, regardless of any biological inclinations for multiple partners.
While the authors find that monogamy is, for the most part, a myth, they actually do not advocate a turn from monogamy for Western cultures, recognizing the immense gains of societies under that system. On the other hand, adultery becomes somewhat more understandable. They do not make any suggestions concerning how open, non-monogamous Western societies could or would work. Overall, the book is rather tedious and repetitious and ultimately disappoints if for no other reason than its misleading title.
The key question about this book is the relevance of sexual behavior among all other animals to us. The behavior of animals is all "natural" and has evolved to ensure the reproduction of the species. Of course, humans are too natural creatures, but we, with our immense brains, have an immense capacity for learning and establishing highly complex social systems with all kinds of enforcement mechanisms, both subtle and direct. Certainly, in Western societies, marriage and monogamy are the only socially permitted relationships, regardless of any biological inclinations for multiple partners.
While the authors find that monogamy is, for the most part, a myth, they actually do not advocate a turn from monogamy for Western cultures, recognizing the immense gains of societies under that system. On the other hand, adultery becomes somewhat more understandable. They do not make any suggestions concerning how open, non-monogamous Western societies could or would work. Overall, the book is rather tedious and repetitious and ultimately disappoints if for no other reason than its misleading title.