中古品: ￥89,800
無料配送 4月21日 日曜日にお届け
詳細を見る
または 最も早い配送 本日中にお届け（5 時間 9 分以内にご注文の場合）
詳細を見る
中古商品: 良い | 詳細
発売元 カメラのノーブル
Amazon.co.jp が発送
コンディション: 中古商品: 良い
コメント: "レンズ前キャップ無し レンズ前玉気泡の様な薄くもりあり" "【外観】多少の擦れキズはありますが全体的には綺麗な外観を保っています。 【機能・動作】 動作確認済みです。 【同梱品】 ※画像に写っているもので全てです。 必ずご確認ください。 【中古保証１ヶ月】万が一、初期不良などが発生した場合には お届けから1ヶ月以内であれば返品返金対応いたします。シリアルナンバー：1805560

フルフィルメントby Amazon™というサービスを利用している出品者の商品になります。これらの商品は、Amazonフルフィルメントセンターにて保管・管理され、Amazon.co.jpが商品の梱包、出荷、返品などを代行しています。フルフィルメントby Amazonの商品は、Amazon.co.jp が販売している商品と同様に国内配送料無料(条件あり)やAmazonプライム®の対象になります。

フルフィルメント by Amazonを利用して、ビジネスの拡大につなげましょう。プログラムについての詳細はこちらです。
中古品 (19)件の出品： ￥89,800

SONY 70-400mm F4-5.6 G SSM II※Aマウント用レンズ(フルサイズ対応) SAL70400G2

5つ星のうち4.0 33
￥89,800 税込
Amazonによる発送
安心・安全への取り組み
お客様情報の保護
Amazonによる発送
  • Amazon.co.jpが発送する商品の通常配送では、条件を満たした場合、日本国内へは無料で商品をお届けします。

    初めてお買い物をされるお客様については、ご注文金額に関わらず通常配送が無料になります。詳しくは、配送料についてをご覧ください。 Amazonプライム会員およびPrime Student会員の方は、配送オプションに関わらず配送料無料です。

    商品の配送状況は注文履歴からも追跡できます。
    配送状況についての詳細はこちらをご覧ください。
  • 詳細はこちら
安心・安全への取り組み
Amazonは安心・安全のために取り組んでいます。ストレスや不安なくお買い物いただくため、商品の返品対応やカスタマーサポート、信頼性のあるカスタマレビューのための健全なコミュニティの運営、お客様のプライバシーの保護などに取り組んでいます。また配送、梱包、製品、物流拠点などさまざまな面で、サステナブルな未来への取り組みを進めています。 詳細はこちら
お客様情報を保護しています
Amazonはお客様のセキュリティとプライバシーの保護に全力で取り組んでいます。Amazonの支払いセキュリティシステムは、送信中にお客様の情報を暗号化します。お客様のクレジットカード情報を出品者と共有することはありません。また、お客様の情報を他者に販売することはありません。 詳細はこちら
残り1点 ご注文はお早めに 在庫状況について
ブランド ソニー(SONY)
レンズタイプ 12群18枚
対応マウント ソニー A
カメラレンズの説明 ズーム
最大焦点距離 400 ミリメートル
アマゾンに出品しませんか？:
アマゾンに買い物に訪れる何億人ものお客様にご自身のブランドの商品をお届けいただけます。
FBAなら配送からカスタマーサービスまでアマゾンにおまかせ。
今なら新規出品者様向け特典で最大787.5万円還元
Amazonで販売を開始する

商品の情報

詳細情報

登録情報

保証とサポート

返品:Amazon.co.jpで購入した商品について、原則として未開封・未使用のものに限り商品到着後30日以内の返品を受け付けます（返品および交換不可の商品を除く）。商品到着後は速やかに商品の状態をご確認ください。初期不良の商品については、お客様からのお問い合わせ内容に応じて返品期間を過ぎてからでも受け付ける場合があります。なお、返品条件は、Amazon.co.jpが発送する商品と、Amazonマーケットプレイス出品者が発送する場合で異なります。家電&カメラの返品について、くわしくはこちら

ご意見ご要望

SONY

SONY 70-400mm F4-5.6 G SSM II※Aマウント用レンズ(フルサイズ対応) SAL70400G2

さらに安い価格を見つけられた場合は、当サイトまでお知らせください。お客様からの情報を参考にして、さらにリーズナブルな価格でご提供できるよう努力します。

さらに安い価格はどこでご覧になりましたか？
/
/
/
/
フィードバックを提供するにはサインインしてください。

類似商品と比較する

この商品
SONY 70-400mm F4-5.6 G SSM II※Aマウント用レンズ(フルサイズ対応) SAL70400G2
SONY 70-400mm F4-5.6 G SSM II※Aマウント用レンズ(フルサイズ対応) SAL70400G2
おすすめ
SIGMA 望遠ズームレンズ 70-300mm F4-5.6 DG MACRO ソニーA(α)マウント
SIGMA 望遠ズームレンズ 70-300mm F4-5.6 DG MACRO ソニーA(α)マウント
dummy
ソニー SONY 望遠ズームレンズ 70-300mm F4.5-5.6 G SSM フルサイズ対応
ソニー SONY 望遠ズームレンズ 70-300mm F4.5-5.6 G SSM フルサイズ対応
dummy
タムロン 150-500mm F/5-6.7 Di III VC VXD ソニーEマウント用 (Model A057)
タムロン 150-500mm F/5-6.7 Di III VC VXD ソニーEマウント用 (Model A057)
dummy
ソニー(SONY) 望遠ズームレンズ APS-C E 70-350mm F4.5-6.3 G OSS Gレンズ デジタル一眼カメラα[Eマウント]用 純正レンズ SEL70350G
ソニー(SONY) 望遠ズームレンズ APS-C E 70-350mm F4.5-6.3 G OSS Gレンズ デジタル一眼カメラα[Eマウント]用 純正レンズ SEL70350G
dummy
ソニー(SONY) 超望遠ズームレンズ フルサイズ FE 200-600mm F5.6-6.3 G OSS Gレンズ デジタル一眼カメラα[Eマウント]用 純正レンズ SEL200600G
ソニー(SONY) 超望遠ズームレンズ フルサイズ FE 200-600mm F5.6-6.3 G OSS Gレンズ デジタル一眼カメラα[Eマウント]用 純正レンズ SEL200600G
詳細
追加されました
詳細
追加されました
詳細
追加されました
詳細
追加されました
詳細
追加されました
詳細
追加されました
価格￥89,800￥28,600￥59,800￥139,100-7% ￥111,034
参考: ￥118,800		￥258,000
配達
最短で4月21日 日曜日のお届け予定です
最短で4月21日 日曜日のお届け予定です
4月 20 - 23 日にお届け
最短で4月21日 日曜日のお届け予定です
—
最短で4月21日 日曜日のお届け予定です
お客様の評価
4.05つ星のうち4.033
3.95つ星のうち3.93,905
3.95つ星のうち3.936
4.45つ星のうち4.4122
4.65つ星のうち4.6101
4.45つ星のうち4.445
画質
—
4.0
4.2
4.5
4.3
4.2
オートフォーカス
—
3.4
4.0
4.4
4.5
4.1
手ぶれ補正
—
3.1
3.4
4.5
4.1
3.8
販売元:
カメラのノーブル
イースクエア【インボイス登録事業者】
幸香プロダクツ【インボイス対応店】
ホームショッピング
測定の森（prime商品は平日14時まで当日発送、送料無料！）
YAMshop
レンズタイプ
12群18枚
10群14枚
11群16枚
望遠
13群19枚
17群24枚
対応マウント
ソニー A
ソニー A
ソニー A
ソニー E
ソニー E
—
レンズデザイン
ズーム
ズーム
ズーム
ズーム
ズーム
ズーム
フォーカスタイプ
オートフォーカス
—
オートフォーカス
オート/マニュアル
—
—
最小焦点距離
70 millimeters
70 millimeters
70 millimeters
150 millimeters
70 millimeters
200 millimeters
最長焦点距離
400 millimeters
300 millimeters
300 millimeters
500 millimeters
350 millimeters
600 millimeters
固定焦点距離
400 millimeters
13 centimeters
300 millimeters
500 millimeters
70 millimeters
200 millimeters
実際の画角
—
34.3 degrees
34 degrees
16 degrees
—
—

商品の説明

商品の説明

●連写時の動体追随性能が大幅に向上●進化した性能●ナノサイズの構造を持つ新コート●連写時の動体追随性能が大幅に向上。●さらにナノARコーティングによりフレア・ゴーストを大幅に低減。●飛躍的に進化した新70-400mmF4-5.6GSSMII動体追尾性能は前モデル（70-400mmF4-5.6GSSM）比約4倍と劇的な高速化に成功。●連写時のAF補足力が格段に向上したことで、スポーツ撮影や動物撮影など、動きの速い被写体にも高い精度でAFが追従します。●また画質面では500mmF4GSSMや300mmF2.8GSSMIIで採用しているソニー独自のコーティング技術ナノARコーティング（NanoARCoating）を採用。●内面反射によるフレア・ゴーストを抑えた、ヌケのよいクリアで透明感のある高い描写性能を実現しました。●70-400mmF4-5.6GSSMIIの進化した性能新しい70-400mmF4-5.6GSSMIIでは、ナノサイズの構造を持つソニー独自の新コーティング技術　ナノARコーティング（NanoARCoating）を採用。●さらに動体追尾性能は前モデル比で約...

ご注意（免責）＞必ずお読みください

併売品のため、品切れの際はご容赦ください。

特定の情報をお探しですか?

重要なお知らせ

ご注意（免責）＞ 必ずお読み下さい

併売品のため、品切れの際はご容赦ください。

カスタマーレビュー

星5つ中4つ
5つのうち4つ
33グローバルレーティング

この商品をレビュー

他のお客様にも意見を伝えましょう
カスタマーレビューを書く

上位レビュー、対象国： 日本

John
5つ星のうち5.0 かなりいけます
2014年6月1日に日本でレビュー済み
Amazonで購入
F値が暗いので、使いにくいかと心配していましたが、感度を自動設定する一眼デジタルなら問題ないです。
この焦点距離にしてはコンパクトで気に入っています。
色々なところでインプレッションが書いてありますが、画像は先鋭ですし、気になっていた長焦点でのボケもうるさくありません。
１５年前のサンニッパよりもずっとコンパクトで綺麗な絵が撮れます。
但し、ズームリングが先端側にあることと、回転方向が逆？なので、最初は戸惑いました。
また、ズームリングは若干フリクションがあり、もう少し滑らかであって欲しいかなと思います。
スポーツ撮影も風景撮影でも問題なくこなせますので、撮影テーマが合うならばお勧めです。
20人のお客様がこれが役に立ったと考えています
役に立った
 レポート

他の国からのトップレビュー

すべてのレビューを日本語に翻訳
D. F. Watt
5つ星のうち5.0 Best Compact Long Telephoto Zoom - Versatile, Well Built, Great Optical Quality But Expensive Relative to Competition
2015年7月8日にアメリカ合衆国でレビュー済み
Amazonで購入
This is an expensive but premium quality long telephoto for A mount. Its only real competition in terms of later model tele zooms for A mount is the Tamron 150-600 f5-6.3 (and I can speak from experience, as I own both lenses, along with several Minolta telephoto primes and TCs).

This review offers some brief comparison of these lenses, all of which offer anywhere from good to great image quality, and good to excellent value (the Sony G2 perhaps being the better lens overall, but the Tamron likely being the better value). Any A Mount body shooter (Alpha 77/77m2/65/55/57/58/33/35 as well as the older Sony DSLRs) looking for a long telephoto should look carefully at this lens, the Tamron 150-600, and the classic Minolta primes (available used in various states of preservation) before deciding which to buy. I would also recommend consulting the full body of reviews for all these lenses on Dyxum, which is a treasure trove of information about the entire A mount lens ecology. There are lots of good options in other words. This review will NOT cover the entirety of the A mount lens ecology (leaving out several older Sigma 400mm telephoto primes, and all the dozens of permutations of various Sony and Minolta and 3rd party 300 2.8 primes and TCs - after all, it's an Amazon review, not a book!)

Pros

1) Optimized for sharpness at the long end - sharper at the long end wide open than any other competing telephoto zoom, including the new Tamron, and premium Canikon products (which are typically excellent). Also quite sharp (on both APS-C and FF) at wide and in middle FL, if stopped down slightly. Overall, a very sharp optic, close to the class leading (for A mount) Minolta 400 4.5 prime, which is probably the benchmark for sharpness at 400mm for Alpha mount
2) Compact size - at least for storage and shooting at 70mm (but extends on full zoom to a rather long lens ~ 13” at 400mm)
3) Virtually no CA or PF (purple fringing, esp. on bright edges, the principle vulnerability of the great Minolta legacy telephoto primes)
4) Built like a tank, like most Sony G lenses
5) Excellent focus limiter
6) Has corrections for vignetting (minimal on APS-C), CA (which is minimal anyway and very well controlled), and distortion (also minimal) in firmware for many A mount bodies - something no 3rd party lens can claim
7) Very quiet and fast focusing, significantly faster than G1 version and somewhat faster than the best of the screw drive legacy lenses (advantage SSM).
8) Great soft case that really protects the lens in case of those potentially disastrous drops
9) The 70mm wide end is really useful if you want to shoot people as well as animals, and is quite fast at that FL (f4) for a long lens, giving an extra measure of utility and reducing your kit size (I can drop the 'beercan' (Minolta's classic f4 70-210) from the lens bag if I need to save weight) given the overlapping range. Almost 6 X zoom range (70-400 overall) is actually pretty impressive, and exceeded only by the Bigma 50-500 (which is poorer at the long end)

Cons:

1) Heavy (but still lighter than the competition) at 3.3 lbs, just at the end of what you can tolerate hand holding for long periods of time.
2) Expensive (roughly twice the price of Tamron 150-600) and only slightly less than a used Minolta 400 4.5 in great condition (which is sharper lens and can use 1.4xTC to get additional reach to 560mm with modest loss of sharpness)
3) Due to being only f5.6 at long end, no AF functionality with Sony or Minolta 1.4xTCs (can use Kenko 1.4TC OTOH, but with slowed AF)
4) Hood seems a bit fragile, particularly for such a heavy lens. Replacement cost for hood (if you can even get one!) is likely to be ridiculous (Sony baloney?)
5) Slightly stiff zoom ring (probably mildly binding from rubber zoom ring)? (contrast it with the butter smooth and light zoom action on the older Minolta Beercan, an unfair comparison perhaps given that the Beercan is a much smaller optic)
6) If you are looking for the smoothest bokeh, look elsewhere (true for virtually all tele zooms) - and get a tele prime instead.
7) Really should be weather-sealed at this price.

That’s it - no major cons in terms of functionality, just premium cost for a premium lens. So how does this stack up against the Minolta primes, the Tamron 150-600 and the older Sigma tele zooms, with both the Sigma and Tamron zooms being less than half the cost? Well, like in relationship to a lot of other technology items, you truly get what you pay for. It’s sharper at 400mm than any of the Tamron or Sigma zooms (but only slightly sharper than the new Tamron if both are at 400), and cropped images from the Sony at 400mm compare well to the Tamron at 600mm, which gets pretty soft frankly all the way out, and not nearly as sharp all the way out as the Sony is at 400. This suggests that the last 150mm or so of the Tamron doesn’t really get you that much - however at 400mm the Tamron is close in sharpness to the Sony and again, only 1/2 the price. So once again, there are basic tradeoffs. The Sony is lighter and more compact, slightly sharper, but lots more $. For BIF shooting, probably would vote for the Sony G2, given likely better AF optimization and wider FL range, lighter weight, and more compact dimensions. But you can't complain about the cost-to-function ratio of the Tamron, a real value home run IMO.

For a bit more money ($2500-3000 for excellent to mint copy) the Minolta 400 4.5 might be sharper, but only a little, although it is also a full stop faster. Although the Minolta and the Sony are roughly equally sharp wide open, if you set both at 5.6 (that’s still wide open for the Sony and a full stop down for the Minolta prime), you would find the Minolta perhaps a bit sharper even than the Sony G2, but OTOH, you will have a bit more PF/CA on the Minolta, and it’s quite a bit heavier and . . . even more money (!). The Minolta prime won’t focus as fast or as quietly, but it can use 1.4TC to get to 560mm. While the SSM of the Sony seems like a big advantage, the old screw drive AF on the Minolta tele prime is still competitive, and the excellent AF system on the Sony A77ii breaths new life into many older legacy Minolta screw drives. So on this comparison, it's the pluses of the Minolta against the PF issue and extra weight and cost that may help you decide which is better for you. As a big plus, the Sony G2 is significantly lighter at 1500 g than either a Minolta 400 tele prime (quite heavy at 1900 g), or the Tamron 150-600 (1950 g) or the Sigma 50-150 (1840 g). Its 3.3 lbs is just on the limit of what you can wear on your Black Rapid or competing strap system. So there you have it. The Sony G2 and the Minolta primes are perhaps the best IQ choices, but all three options are in fact good to great values. The Minolta 400 4.5 is actually a phenomenal value, given the 2x cost of competing Canikon products. Only its screw drive and vulnerability to purple fringing are downsides, and the PF is easily removed in post processing, and as noted above, the screw drive is actually pretty fast and accurate with the A77ii. People complain about the lens ecology of Sony vs. the Big Two, but this is an example actually of where that negative chatter doesn't really hold up to much careful scrutiny. Admittedly, A mount lacks newer telephoto primes, particularly a 400 prime and a newer f4 300, but that's really about it. This lens is still better than the competing Canikon products (see testing at DPR).

Hopefully, this gives you a quick survey of the main current options for long telephoto zooms on your Alpha body.

Highly recommended overall.
26人のお客様がこれが役に立ったと考えています
 レポート
Mike C.
5つ星のうち4.0 Very sharp. Long reach. Virtually no CA. Quite heavy. Not weather sealed.
2013年12月26日にアメリカ合衆国でレビュー済み
Amazonで購入
Haven't had the chance to use the lens extensively as the weather has not been ideal for shooting on the occasions I want to use it(and the lens isn't weather sealed). But on the few occasions I have gotten to use it, the focusing has been very snappy with a good hit rate on focus, and the shots are very sharp.

Purchased the lens to replace a 75-300SAL that I was using to get decent reach for photographing kids outdoor sports. The 75-300 was just not cutting it, mainly because of the very harsh chromatic aberration, but its a $250 lens.

70-400 has more reach than the 75-300(600mm vs 450mm equivalent on my APS-C), tack sharp, and the chromatic aberration is virtually non-existent(the biggest plus in my mind). But then it is a $2200 lens vs the $250.

It is quite heavy. I would suggest a monopod for any extended shooting. And the lens is not weather sealed, though the fit and finish are superb.

Hopefully I will have a chance to revisit this review in the future. I am reluctant to give any product a 5 rating without more extensive use, but if the lens continues to perform well I may well increase my rating.
23人のお客様がこれが役に立ったと考えています
 レポート
Daniel
5つ星のうち1.0 May be good product but bad customer service
2015年11月4日にアメリカ合衆国でレビュー済み
Amazonで購入
I received this lenses defective on arrival on my birthday. I understand that it could happen with any product. This is all OK.

But after that I spent almost a week with SONY customer service to get the link to Precision Camera Service Center. They needed proof of purchase but only as attachment, and they do not answer you at all if something wrong, so I needed call them again and again.
After that I am supposed pay for shipping to Precision Camera Service Center and I have to wait for unknown reasons more than two weeks (lenses in repair status from Oct 22).

Why SONY is not replacing defective products? Why customers should spent so much time trying to get expensive product repaired?
I am very disappointed.
11人のお客様がこれが役に立ったと考えています
 レポート
Barb
5つ星のうち5.0 Great option for super zoom for sony a7R II
2016年2月15日にアメリカ合衆国でレビュー済み
Amazonで購入
Wanted a super zoom and decided to go with this since my camera is a Sony a7R II  Sony a7R II Full-Frame Mirrorless Interchangeable Lens Camera, Body Only (Black) (ILCE7RM2/B) . I am doing a 4 day rocky mountain workshop later in the year and needed a super zoom. I did research super zooms - since they are not inexpensive. So far this has worked out well. There are many well written reviews on this lens (make sure you read the G2 reviews to get accurate features and not earlier model).
Here are a few considerations:
This lens is heavy - if you have never had a lens this large - it takes some adjustment.
You may need a heavy duty tripod. I am partial to the right stuff but there are several options out there - just make sure that the tripod and the ball mount can hold a 400mm lens.
Attach your strap to the lens and not the camera. Particularly if you are using a mirrorless camera like the Sony a7R II.
Sony makes a great product and I am delighted with the photos I have taken so far. This lens is quick and focus is sharp.
6人のお客様がこれが役に立ったと考えています
 レポート
Hap
5つ星のうち3.0 Not the great lens I thought it would be.
2015年8月30日にアメリカ合衆国でレビュー済み
Amazonで購入
It's hard to say that I believe a lens is not up to all the high praise it receives when so many people seem so happy with it, but that's my situation. I have spent a week shooting birds as well as just ordinary snaps around the garden with my new Sony 70-400 G2 on my trusty A77ii. At best I got "shoulder shrug" results. I was expecting much better results than I get with my Tamron 150-600 USD, Tamron 70-300 USD, Minolta 100-300 APO & Minolta 100-400 APO. I'm not saying these other lenses are great; I bought the Sony because I wanted to step up from these, but the Sony 70-400 g2 was not tack sharp even at F8. It was just OK at 400mm, perhaps a little better at 300mm. But I do large 13"x19" prints. If this was a $500 lens or even a $1000 lens, I might keep it. It's not bad. It's certainly much lighter than the Tamron 150-600. But for me to pay $2100, I have to be able to say the lens is really, really, really good, and signicantly better than any of the others I already have. It's not. It's marginally better in some cases and not at all better in others. Am I crazy? Well, DXOmark rates it as on the "poor" end of the scale for sharpness, and for birds, I need sharp! I suspect I might have bad copy, but I am not willing to fuss around with trying to get a good copy of this lens. I will return it. Final Note: The clincher came when the clouds and rain rolled in this week. This lens HATES low light. Since the best results are not at f5.6, but at f8, that means that you must increase the ISO, which of course increases the noise. I was hoping that I could shoot wide open at the long end (I had read that it was unusually sharp for a telezoom at the long end). No chance oh getting sharp shots at the long end 99% of the time. My Sony flash helps, but not much at 400 mm ;) Disappointed.

PS: Something did seem to be not working with the AF that is probably specific to this copy of this lens. When we first got it, I thought that the Minimum Focusing Distance had been understated. We measured the minimum distance at which I could auto focus as being 9 ft, considerably more than the stated 1.5 meters/5 ft. However, when I used Manual Focus, I could easily move closer to be subject to the 5 ft distance. I was using focus peaking to confirm manual focus. I had no problems with Manual Focus at any focal length, but I haven't perfected getting (BIF) Birds in Flight using Manual! And the shots were not superior in quality as stated above. However, the problems with AF were not consistent. Sometimes it would seem OK, then other times not OK. Most often the "Not OK" happened in low(ish) light (cloudy afternoon outside or in the house under multiple skylights without flash--I'm not talking about twilight here), while the OK AF shots were in bright daylight or with flash. My husband tried the Sony 70-400 G2 with his A6000 and the LAEA4 adapter. He had all the same issues.
8人のお客様がこれが役に立ったと考えています
 レポート